by

Global Warming Hoax


Global Warming Hoax Scientists caught red-handed fixing data (BIG NEWS)

 by Scott Simons

Scientist used mainly for support of the UN, Al Gore and Global Governance groups have been exposed.  They are criminally manipulating information that would disprove global warming and actual evidences showing the earth has been cooling.

Complicit several main stream news sites have been sitting on the new found proof for nearly a month.  Not only it is evident from the thousands of pages of email, memos, and documents captured in a hacked attack a couple of months ago, what is extremely disturbing is that it exposes how the CRU http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk conspired to undermine honest scientists to destroy them and their work.

I could go on with tons of information but all you need to do to check this out yourself is Google, Yahoo, Start Page, type in “ClimateGate” and you can find it all out, (except in the Main Stream Media), this needs to go viral, at the grass-roots level. 

I found the fullest coverage is www.inforwars.com but there are many other sites.

It is up to us to spread the news, because the silence is going to be deafening from the MSM (main stream media). 

If you are a principled person that would like to lead a STAR forum in your area, please contact us here.

20 thoughts on “Global Warming Hoax”

  1. Pingback: Moonbattery » Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology Caught Fudging Data to Prop Up Global Warming Hoax

  3. When I see the Dems and Reps in Washington, I see much of the same. They both take away our liberties and increase the size of government. They may take different approaches on how they do it, but the end game is the same. More government for them and less freedom for us.

    This is why I find it so unproductive to see Dems fighting against Reps when it should be we the people against power hungry politicians. The powerful career politicians need us to bicker and choose side, it keeps the spotlight and blame off of them.

    I think this climate change debate is the same thing. It’s just another difference that is keeping the people divided, when it is really very easily solved. Protect private property and government stays out of the regulation business. Private property is sacred according to the Constitution. Sending dirty water, air or soil from your property to mine is a clear cut violation. The laws are already laid, all we have to do is pressure our govt to enforce them.

    Like

    Reply

  4. This is an excellent interview by Lord Monckton. I have to admit, I haven’t looked at the data either, but there is no “taxing” agenda behind those that don’t believe in Global Warming. Follow the money.

    Like

    Reply

    • Main Stream can try to hid it, but this is to big, it will come out and it will expose all those involed, they might as well come clean, and not be part of the cover up.

      Like

      Reply

  7. Here is part of one email from the Director of the (CRU) Climate Project (Phil Jones) who recently has temporarily stepped down:

    At 09:41 AM 2/2/2005, Phil Jones wrote:

    Mike,
    I presume congratulations are in order – so congrats etc ! Just sent loads of station data to Scott. Make sure he documents everything better this time ! And don’t leave stuff lying around on ftp sites – you never know who is
    trawling them. The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone. Does your similar act in the US force you to respond to enquiries within 20 days? – our does ! The UK works on precedents, so the first request will test it.

    We also have data protection act, which I will hide behind. Tom Wigley has sent me a worried email when he heard about it – thought people could ask him for his model code. He has retired officially from UEA so he can hide behind that. IPR should be relevant here, but I can see me getting into an argument with someone at UEA who’ll say we must adhere to it ! Are you planning a complete reworking of your paleo series? Like to be involved if you are. Had a quick look at Ch 6 on paleo of AR4. The MWP side bar references Briffa, Bradley, Mann, Jones, Crowley, Hughes, Diaz – oh and Lamb ! Looks OK, but I can’t see it getting past all the stages in its present form. MM and SB get dismissed. All the
    right emphasis is there, but the wording on occasions will be crucial. I expect this to be the main contentious issue in AR4. I expect (hope) that the MSU one will fade away. It seems the more the CCSP (the thing Tom Karl is organizing) looks into Christy and Spencer’s series, the more problems/issues they are finding. I might be on the NRC review panel,
    so will keep you informed. Rob van Dorland is an LA on the Radiative Forcing chapter, so he’s a paleo expert by GRL statndards.
    Cheers
    Phil

    Like

    Reply

  8. Thanks for the additional insights. I have added you to my blog roll, so hopefull more people will se you there and click on over.

    It is time to step away form the computer for now, but I will be back to read the additional links.

    Like

    Reply

  10. I don’t think this climate change issue is black and white. Of course we have an impact on our environment. It may not be as large as some say and but we must have an impact. What I don’t like is government taking my freedoms to deal with it. If the constitution was followed, private property rights would be guarded, solving this issue. For instance, if I get sick because a coal plant is spewing filth into the air of my property, the constitution protects me and they are required to stop. This can be applied to water, soil or whatever. In the end, we would have clean air and water, because the constitution protect private property. We don’t need to be taxed and enslaved to do it.

    Like

    Reply

    • You are absolutely correct; it is all designed to take our freedom, land and life away. All that the Constitution protects, and the biggest polluters are those orchestrating this big hoax.

      Like

      Reply

  14. Not only has the silence shocked me, but the attack of those who do acknowledge it has been on those who are reporting it! I even read one article that insisted people who don’t believe in global warming will use the same tactics to prove it as they do to say they believe in God. Really??? Since when has believing in God been a personality flaw that makes you question global warming? I don’t see the connection.

    Thanks for the links- I am still not completely educated on the e-mails and all the information that has been squashed, but believe me, I will be talking about it!

    Like

    Reply

    • Thank you for your comments. And I appreciate you putting a link on your blog page to this article. As a person who believes in God, I know it is my stewardship to help take care of the earth, but not at the expense of human life. We can make our world better, cleaner, and use renewable energy, but not through scare tactics and false information.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Comment, and enter the discussion.